Carotid Artery Stenting Rates Continue to Rise Among Elderly

radiologist checking carotid
radiologist checking carotid
There was a significant increase in carotid artery stenting from the pre- to post-CREST period.

The use of carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures has increased significantly for elderly patients with congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and symptomatic stenosis following the publication of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST), according to a retrospective study published in JAMA Neurology.

Using the National Inpatient Sample and the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedural codes, investigators retrospectively identified adult patients >70 years of age who underwent carotid revascularization between 2007 and 2014. Researchers compared CAS procedure rates from the pre-CREST era (2007-2010) vs the post-CREST era (2011-2014). A total of 494,733 weighted carotid revascularization admissions were included in the final analysis.

Among patients with symptomatic stenosis, CAS and carotid endarterectomy procedures were performed in 16.3% and 10.1%, respectively. There was a significant increase in CAS from the pre- to post-CREST period (11.9% to 13.8%; P =.005). Additionally, odds of undergoing CAS rose by 13% in the post- vs pre-CREST era in all patients >70 years old (odds ratio [OR] 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00-1.28; P =.04).

Patients with congestive heart failure (OR 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35-1.63; P <.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.27-1.43; P <.001), and symptomatic stenosis (OR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.27-1.52; P <.001) had significantly higher odds of receiving CAS. Conversely, there was a negative association between smoking (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91; P <.001), weekend hospital admission (OR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88; P <.001), and comorbid hypertension (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74; P <.001) and odds of undergoing a CAS procedure.

Related Articles

The possibility of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, coding errors could have led to inaccuracies in appropriate patient identification, thereby limiting the overall findings of this retrospective analysis. In addition, the investigators were unable to assess each patient’s degree of stenosis or congestive heart failure, ejection fraction, or other characteristics of plaque burden that may have had an impact on the choice of revascularization procedure.

In addition to findings from the CREST trial, the researchers suggest that current referral networks “for carotid revascularization and subspecialty of physicians performing these procedures may also be influencing revascularization patterns.”


Otite FO, Khandelwal P, Malik AM, Chaturvedi S. National patterns of carotid revascularization before and after the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST). JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:51-57.